All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

BELLINI trial survival analysis: Venetoclax vs placebo in RRMM

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Oct 13, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Results from a survival analysis of the phase III BELLINI trial (NCT02755597) evaluating the efficacy and safety of venetoclax vs placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in 291 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were published by Kumar et al. in Lancet Haematology. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Key data: The median PFS was 23.4 months vs 11.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.78; p = 0.00026) in the venetoclax vs placebo group. The median PFS was longer with venetoclax for translocation (11;14)-positive status (36.8 months vs 9.3 months; p = 0.00041) and BCL2high (30.1 months vs 9.9 months; p < 0.0001) vs placebo. 

Key learning: Patients with RRMM treated with venetoclax vs placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone had improved survival outcomes, especially those with t(11;14) and BCL2high. The findings support a biomarker-driven approach using venetoclax in the management of RRMM.  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content